W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > October 2011

csswg/css3-values Overview.html,1.105,1.106 Overview.src.html,1.108,1.109

From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 22:18:58 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RDOBW-0005il-9Y@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-values
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv21968

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Suggest using 'default' keyword for rollback.

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-values/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.105
retrieving revision 1.106
diff -u -d -r1.105 -r1.106
--- Overview.html	10 Oct 2011 22:18:07 -0000	1.105
+++ Overview.html	10 Oct 2011 22:18:56 -0000	1.106
@@ -610,7 +610,8 @@
    back to the end of the user cascade, for a user rule it would roll back to
    the end of the UA cascade, and for the UA it would roll back to
    &lsquo;<code class=css>initial</code>&rsquo;/&lsquo;<code
-   class=css>inherit</code>&rsquo;. Is that something we should add?
+   class=css>inherit</code>&rsquo;. Is that something we should add, perhaps
+   using the reserved &lsquo;<code class=css>default</code>&rsquo; keyword?
 
   <h3 id=identifiers><span class=secno>3.2. </span> User-defined Identifiers:
    the &lsquo;<a href="#identifier-value"><code

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-values/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.108
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -d -r1.108 -r1.109
--- Overview.src.html	10 Oct 2011 22:18:08 -0000	1.108
+++ Overview.src.html	10 Oct 2011 22:18:56 -0000	1.109
@@ -301,12 +301,12 @@
 	value? See <a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0075.html">various</a>
 	<a href="http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011May/0402.html">issues</a>.
 
-<p class="issue">It's been requested to have a value that rolls back
-to the bottom of that level of the cascade, e.g. for an author rule
-it would roll back to the end of the user cascade, for a user rule
-it would roll back to the end of the UA cascade, and for the UA it
-would roll back to ''initial''/''inherit''. Is that something we should
-add?
+	<p class="issue">It's been requested to have a value that rolls back
+	to the bottom of that level of the cascade, e.g. for an author rule
+	it would roll back to the end of the user cascade, for a user rule
+	it would roll back to the end of the UA cascade, and for the UA it
+	would roll back to ''initial''/''inherit''. Is that something we should
+	add, perhaps using the reserved ''default'' keyword?</p>
 
 <h3 id="identifiers">
 User-defined Identifiers: the ''&lt;identifier&gt;'' type</h3>
Received on Monday, 10 October 2011 22:19:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 10 October 2011 22:19:06 GMT