W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > October 2011

csswg/css3-images Overview.html,1.175,1.176 Overview.src.html,1.182,1.183

From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 22:30:52 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RAr2C-0008NU-RQ@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv32190

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Change default-object-size issue to a note that future specs will need to define the DOS by themselves.

Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.175
retrieving revision 1.176
diff -u -d -r1.175 -r1.176
--- Overview.html	3 Oct 2011 22:29:12 -0000	1.175
+++ Overview.html	3 Oct 2011 22:30:50 -0000	1.176
@@ -1485,10 +1485,9 @@
        rel=biblioentry>[CSS21]<!--{{!CSS21}}--></a>
      </dl>
 
-     <p class=issue>The only reason these are examples is because the proper
-      place for the normative definitions of default object sizes is in the
-      definitions for the relevant properties. These are the correct values,
-      though.</p>
+     <p class=note>Future properties that take an &lt;image> component value
+      are expected to define the <a href="#default-object-size"><i>default
+      object size</i></a> for themselves.</p>
     </div>
   </dl>
   <!-- ====================================================================== -->

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.182
retrieving revision 1.183
diff -u -d -r1.182 -r1.183
--- Overview.src.html	3 Oct 2011 22:29:13 -0000	1.182
+++ Overview.src.html	3 Oct 2011 22:30:50 -0000	1.183
@@ -954,10 +954,8 @@
 					<dd>The <i>default object size</i> is a rectangle 300px wide and 150px
 					tall. [[!CSS21]]</dd>
 				</dl>
-				<p class=issue>The only reason these are examples is because the proper 
-				place for the normative definitions of default object sizes is in the 
-				definitions for the relevant properties.  These are the correct values,
-				though.</p>
+
+				<p class=note>Future properties that take an &lt;image> component value are expected to define the <i>default object size</i> for themselves.</p>
 			</div>
 		</dd>
 	</dl>
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 22:30:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 3 October 2011 22:30:55 GMT