W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-commits@w3.org > January 2011

csswg/css3-images Overview.html,1.59,1.60 Overview.src.html,1.61,1.62

From: Tab Atkins Jr.. via cvs-syncmail <cvsmail@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:13:44 +0000
To: public-css-commits@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PiVPk-0002rV-16@lionel-hutz.w3.org>
Update of /sources/public/csswg/css3-images
In directory hutz:/tmp/cvs-serv10987

Modified Files:
	Overview.html Overview.src.html 
Log Message:
Removed notes about image-fit and image-position.


Index: Overview.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.html,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -d -r1.59 -r1.60
--- Overview.html	27 Jan 2011 17:08:23 -0000	1.59
+++ Overview.html	27 Jan 2011 17:13:41 -0000	1.60
@@ -1771,12 +1771,6 @@
       class=property>object-position</code></a>&rsquo;.</p>
     </div>
 
-    <p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias &lsquo;<code
-     class=property>image-position</code>&rsquo; and &lsquo;<code
-     class=property>image-fit</code>&rsquo; (the old names for these
-     properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually need to do
-     so?</p>
-
     <p class=note>Note: the &lsquo;<a href="#object-fit0"><code
      class=property>object-fit</code></a>&rsquo; property has similar
      semantics to the fit attribute in <a href="#SMIL10"
@@ -1844,12 +1838,6 @@
 
     <p class=note>Note that areas of the box not covered by the replaced
      element will show the element's background.</p>
-
-    <p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias &lsquo;<code
-     class=property>image-position</code>&rsquo; and &lsquo;<code
-     class=property>image-fit</code>&rsquo; (the old names for these
-     properties) to these properties? Does any browser actually need to do
-     so?</p>
    </div>
   </div>
 

Index: Overview.src.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/public/csswg/css3-images/Overview.src.html,v
retrieving revision 1.61
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -d -r1.61 -r1.62
--- Overview.src.html	27 Jan 2011 17:08:23 -0000	1.61
+++ Overview.src.html	27 Jan 2011 17:13:41 -0000	1.62
@@ -1262,10 +1262,6 @@
 		  initial value for 'object-position'.</p>
 		</div>
 
-		<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias 'image-position' and 'image-fit'
-		(the old names for these properties) to these properties?  Does any browser actually
-		need to do so?</p>
-
 		<p class="note">Note: the 'object-fit' property has similar semantics to
 		the fit attribute in [[SMIL10]].</p>
 	</div>
@@ -1309,10 +1305,6 @@
 
 		<p class="note">Note that areas of the box not covered by the replaced
 		element will show the element's background.</p>
-
-		<p class=issue>Do we need to allow browsers to alias 'image-position' and 'image-fit'
-		(the old names for these properties) to these properties?  Does any browser actually
-		need to do so?</p>
 	</div>
 </div>
 
Received on Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:13:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 27 January 2011 17:13:45 GMT