- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:17:22 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27384 --- Comment #8 from Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> --- > Is there a tracking bug for that? I don't know. > so kicking @namespace and @charset out of CSSOM and implementations seems > feasible. I'm 99% sure there is stuff depending on existence of @namespace rules, at least (e.g. editors built on top of browser engines). Not web content, but not things we really want to break nevertheless. At least in my opinion. > Are there other facets of insertRule interop that I'm missing? I don't know. There's clearly no set of decent exhaustive tests for this that has been run cross-browser... > it seems plausible that making insertRule(rule) with no index append > instead of prepend would work Maybe. What should insertRule(rule, undefined) do? Right now it prepends in all UAs, right? I mean, we could make that work differently from insertRule(rule) with the second argument omitted, but that's not all that desirable; we should only do that as a last resort. Especially if we're only doing it as a workaround for WebkitAnimationName existing, since the long-term goal is for that to not exist. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 24 November 2014 15:17:23 UTC