public-css-bugzilla@w3.org from September 2012 by thread

[Bug 19142] New: multiple values of backgrounds, shadows aren't so "cascading" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 29 September)

[Bug 16855] flexbox must not assume child writing mode is same or parallel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 16855] flexbox must not assume child writing mode is same or parallel bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 16858] Should creation of regions from elements be disallowed? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 16859] Reconsider using @rule for region styling bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 16622] Should we rename region-overflow to flow-overset? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 27 September)

[Bug 17011] This appears to be untrue; both CSS background images and fonts will typically delay the load event (and so are critical subresources) in normal circumstances but may not in other circumanstances (only referenced by a selector that doesn't match the docum bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Sunday, 23 September)

[Bug 18961] New: The pseudo-code for matrix-decomposing has a typo in the check for a coordinate system flip bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 21 September)

[Bug 16346] It would be nice to allow zero-padding the displayed number. Maybe even a choice of hexadecimal number besides decimal one. bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Friday, 21 September)

[Bug 18939] New: Ambiguous transition shorthand bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 18937] New: Ambiguous animation shorthand bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 18476] Failure to define that a table-caption element is block-level bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 18346] Desire to define "Block container element" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 18346] Desire to define "Block container element" bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 18930] New: Do all rendered elements generate a principal box? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 20 September)

[Bug 17122] "Applies To" line for 'overflow' property hinders forwards-compatibility bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 17122] "Applies To" line for 'overflow' property hinders forwards-compatibility bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 17122] "Applies To" line for 'overflow' property hinders forwards-compatibility bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 17121] Desire to introduce the concept of a "formatting context" for forwards compatibility bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 18497] Should values of 'overflow' applying to (inline-)table elements be restricted? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 18497] Should values of 'overflow' applying to (inline-)table elements be restricted? bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Thursday, 13 September)

[Bug 18839] New: array() values shall be comma-separated bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 11 September)

[Bug 16228] Font matching algorithm should explain cluster-based matching bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Tuesday, 11 September)

[Bug 18767] New: Something appears to be wrong with the checkSpecificationIssues() call bugzilla@jessica.w3.org (Saturday, 1 September)

Last message date: Saturday, 29 September 2012 14:37:56 UTC