W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > May 2012

[Bug 17138] Stricter use of box terminology throughout in spec (follow-up to Issue 120, inc Issue 266)

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 13:13:37 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SWSQb-0008QJ-57@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17138

--- Comment #1 from Anton P <antonsforums@yahoo.co.uk> 2012-05-21 13:13:36 UTC ---
Reported by Anton Prowse

Need to tighten up the use of box terminology throughout the spec, in response
to the terminology changes made in Issue 120.  The changes are described in
Issue 266:

Issue 266: http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-266

Summary
    Issue 120 follow-up
URL
    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jan/0079.html
Proposal :

* Accept proposals 1 & 2 with "block container element" instead of "block
container"

    accept 3
    accept 4
    accept 5 with s/which/that/
    accept 7 (but beware second set of edits applies to second quoted sentence,
not first)

Resolution
    Accept issue 6 edits, push rest to errata.
Status
    Closed. =errata=

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 21 May 2012 13:14:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 May 2012 13:14:03 GMT