- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 11:49:08 +0000
- To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16445 --- Comment #2 from Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu> 2012-03-20 11:49:08 UTC --- # <!-- not a flexbox item, because it's out-of-flow --> # <div id="not-an-item1.5" style="position: absolute;">block</div> # # <!-- flexbox item: block-level child --> # <div id="item2" style="display:table">table</div> Given that the placeholder for the absolutely positioned element generates an anonymous flexbox item, the next number should be item3, I think. # <!-- flexbox item: anonymous block around inline content --> # anonymous item 4 It's not clear to me if you really want to classify an anonymous flexbox item as an anonymous block, given that you didn't say so in # 3. Contiguous run of non-replaced inline children, wrapped into an anonymous # box and given that an atomic inline-level flexbox item is not a block. (That is, the annonymous flexblox item could be an anonymous inline-block too (at least conceptually since it doesn't matter).) -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 11:49:14 UTC