[Bug 16445] New: (editorial) Ch 4. Flexbox Items

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16445

           Summary: (editorial) Ch 4. Flexbox Items
           Product: CSS
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Flexbox
        AssignedTo: jackalmage@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: kennyluck@csail.mit.edu
         QAContact: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: dbaron@dbaron.org, alexmog@microsoft.com


Section: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-flexbox/#flex-items

  # Flexbox layout algorithm operates on flexbox items, which are boxes that
  # satisfy at least one of the following criteria:

I can't think of boxes that can simultaneously satisfy two criteria. Can we
remove "at least" here? It might be confusing even if it is mathematically
sound.

  #    <!-- flexbox item: block-level replaced element -->
  #    <iframe id="item7"> 

<iframe> is by default 'display: inline'.

  #    <!-- flexbox item: inline-level replaced element -->
  #    <img id="item7" style="display:inline">

I don't think 'style="display:inline"' is necessary here. It's not clear to me
if that declaration would actually make things clearer or confuse people...

  #    <!-- flexbox item: inline-level replaced element -->
  #    <button id="item8">button</button>

I know <button> is atomic, although whether it is a replaced element seems
quite debatable...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2012 10:40:09 UTC