W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-bugzilla@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 16003] CSSTransformValue is defined, but there's no way to get one

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:15:48 +0000
To: public-css-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Ry7k4-0002nm-My@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16003

--- Comment #5 from Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> 2012-02-16 20:15:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Sorry, that makes no sense at all. On the one hand you say we don't need it
> because we can't access it. On the other hand you say we should leave it in the
> Spec?

No, I'm saying we should leave stuff in the spec only if it's actually defined.
 For instance, getComputedStyle() is defined by CSSOM, so we should leave in
the stuff that relates to getComputedStyle() and try to make it as accurate as
possible.  But if there's no way that's defined to get a CSSTransformValue, we
shouldn't spec it.  Either we should define a way to get one, or remove it from
the spec.  Either way is fine by me, if non-WebKit implementations have support
for it or are interested in adding it.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 20:15:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 16 February 2012 20:15:54 GMT