public-css-archive@w3.org from February 2024 by author

Adam Argyle via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `[css-media-5]` - `prefers-reduced-data` question: special behavior when turned off and on post page load? (#9475) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Consider `background-attachment: fixed()` to enable attaching to more than the viewport [css-background] (#9927) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Adam Kudrna via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align][css-inline] Support for aligning items to the center of the first line. (#9854) (Friday, 23 February)

Adam Wathan via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Adrian Roselli via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Should the reading-order-items property apply to tables in addition to flex and grid layouts? (#9922) (Sunday, 25 February)

agerzi via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] alen.gerzic.gmail.com (#9894) (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] alen.gerzic@gmail.com (#9893) (Friday, 2 February)

Alan Stearns via GitHub

• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Should not cq units be interpreted in the flatDom context? (#7947) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] accept "px" for pixel values in `border-image-slice` (#6739) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] accept "px" for pixel values in `border-image-slice` (#6739) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [Contributing.md] Suggestion to improve the contribution best practices (#9928) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Support View Transitions on a DOM subtree (#9890) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [view-transitions-1] Have the `-image-pair`, `-old`, and `-new` pseudos inherit `animation-delay` (#9817) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui?] Allow `<input>` and `<select>` to be sized by contents (#7552) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Aleksandr Beliaev via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1] Dynamic changes of state and attributes referenced by :host-context rules are pretty hard to handle efficiently. (#1914) (Saturday, 10 February)

Alexey Ardov via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Alison Maher via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust-1] Emojis in forced colors mode (#8064) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] What is the max-content width of a muticol container with only column-width:<length> (#9103) (Tuesday, 13 February)

AMIT KUMAR MISHRA via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] `scrollbar-width` should support custom measurements (#6263) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] `scrollbar-width` should support custom measurements (#6263) (Thursday, 8 February)

Ana Tudor via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Sunday, 18 February)

Andreu Botella via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Is continue: discard working in the fragment tree useful? (#7708) (Friday, 9 February)

Andrew Baxter via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-3] Layout-affecting Transforms (#1487) (Thursday, 1 February)

andruud via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Friday, 16 February)

Anne van Kesteren via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Anoesj Sadraee via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox-2] Add flex-wrap: balance; (#3070) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)

Antti Koivisto via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Style feature parsing should disallow !important (#9986) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Style feature parsing should disallow !important (#9986) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Inconsistent handling of known and unknown features jeopardizes backward compatibility (#7551) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Arvind Kumar via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Monday, 5 February)

Benoît Rouleau via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] Hyphenate only overflowing words? (#616) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] Hyphenate only overflowing words? (#616) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Proposal for a :hover-only pseudo class (#7544) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Proposal for a :hover-only pseudo class (#7544) (Tuesday, 13 February)

bogger33 via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Do we need :focus-visible-within ? (#3080) (Monday, 12 February)

bottosson via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)

Brad Kemper via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Proposed alternative syntax for reading order (#9923) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Should the reading-order-items property apply to tables in addition to flex and grid layouts? (#9922) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] drafting reading-order-items issue #8589 (#9845) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Bramus via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Let B default to 1 in `round(<strategy>?, A, B)` (#9668) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [Contributing.md] Suggestion to improve the contribution best practices (#9928) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [CONTRIBUTING.md] Clarify that PRs should originate from your own fork (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Allow <length-percentage> in <keyframe-selector> when combined with <timeline-range-name> (#10000) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] Is linear() easing in a shippable state? (#7533) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations] proposal idea: animating non-element JS objects, `ObjectKeyframeEffect` and `Animator` API, or similar (#9974) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Support for some font styles and decorations (#8355) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Allow Custom Highlights on `textarea`/`input[type="text"]` (#9971) (Monday, 19 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Allow Custom Highlights on `textarea`/`input[type="text"]` (#9971) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Need to support a mechanism for creating ranges inside textarea and input elements (#4603) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Should ::highlights be printed? (#7499) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Add a pseudo-element to style all highlight pseudo-elements (#9091) (Monday, 19 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-highlight-api] Allow Custom Highlights on `textarea`/`input[type="text"]` (#9971) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Friday, 16 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations] Check that all edits from 2012 TPAC have been made (#75) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Friday, 16 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Allow authors do define custom `color-scheme` values. (#9660) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] Force render scrollbar thumb of overlay scrollbars (#9785) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Allow authors do define custom `color-scheme` values. (#9660) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting] Allow CSS nesting for inline styles (#8752) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] How should scroll timeline animations be treated? (#9901) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] view-transition-name determined by element (#8320) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Support View Transitions on a DOM subtree (#9890) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Starting a transition half way through another transition (#8687) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [view-transitions-2] Add method to get all animations of a ViewTransition object (#9908) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] How should scroll timeline animations be treated? (#9901) (Monday, 5 February)

Brandon McConnell via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Brian Birtles via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] line-break: strict should use UAX#14 rule? (#9432) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-4] Add note about deviations from UAX-14 (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-4] Add note about deviations from UAX-14 (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations-2] Declarative syntax for GroupEffects (#9554) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] line-break: strict should use UAX#14 rule? (#9432) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Specify Animation progress API (#9937) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations] proposal idea: animating non-element JS objects, `ObjectKeyframeEffect` and `Animator` API, or similar (#9974) (Monday, 19 February)

Brian Kardell via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New selector to facilitate utility classes (`[name~^=value]`? `.prefix-*`?) (#10001) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Do we need :focus-visible-within ? (#3080) (Monday, 12 February)

Brian Osman via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)

brunoais via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Sunday, 25 February)

Callie Riggins Zetino via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui][selectors][mediaqueries] Expose current scrolling direction (#6400) (Thursday, 15 February)

ChangSeok Oh via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust: ic-height (#8792) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust: ic-height (#8792) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust precedes font metrics overrides #8967 (Wednesday, 7 February)

Chris Barnes via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selector-for-is-attribute] Feature Request (#9973) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selector-for-is-attribute] Feature Request (#9973) (Sunday, 18 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-selector-for-is-attribute] Feature Request (#9973) (Saturday, 17 February)

Chris Harrelson via GitHub

• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-zoom?] Zoom and inheritance. (#9397) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-zoom?] Zoom and CSSOM (#9398) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-zoom?] Zoom and replaced element intrinsic dimensions (#9442) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Containing block of dialog fixed position children (#8040) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (Thursday, 1 February)

Chris Lilley via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] Broken references in CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3 (#8075) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] Broken references in CSS Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3 (#8075) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-3] Steps to Recommendation (#10010) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-3] Steps to Recommendation (#10010) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CONTRIBUTING.md] Clarify that PRs should originate from your own fork (#10009) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] "specified value" here would better be reworded as declared value (#9993) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4][css-color-5][css-color-6] Describe CSSOM serialization in terms of declared values rather than specified values, fix #9993 (#9995) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Clarify maximum number of `<feature-value-names>` in `character-variant()` (#9311) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Selecting generic fallbacks (#8128) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] "specified value" here would better be reworded as declared value (#9993) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Interaction between font-synthesis-style and variable fonts (#9391) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Selecting generic fallbacks (#8128) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-fonts] [css-page] Sort out properties and descriptors. (#9686) (Friday, 23 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] @font-face supports incremental (#6063) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [css-fonts-5] Broken references in CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and 5 (#9965) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] @font-face supports incremental (#6063) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] Resolving color-mix() (#7302) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] color-mix() percentage normalization doesn't match animations. (#7324) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-5] relative color syntax: numbers vs. percentages in `calc()` (#9759) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [indexes] `property-name` should probably not be in the list of properties (#9982) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Resolving and serializing the opacity property (#8311) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] linkable definition of palette-mix() function (not <palette-mix()> type) (#9969) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] Add CSS property to limit dynamic range of HDR content (#9074) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] Add CSS property to limit dynamic range of HDR content (#9074) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] linkable definition of palette-mix() function (not <palette-mix()> type) (#9969) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [css-fonts-5] Broken references in CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and 5 (#9965) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [css-fonts-5] Broken references in CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and 5 (#9965) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-content-3] Add WPT annotations (#9962) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4][css-color-5] color-mix() and cross-fade() have different serialization order? (#9405) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] `cross-fade()` is sRGB-only (#9959) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] A proposal for controlling screen brightness (#6990) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] Incomplete sample code for color conversions (#9934) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] How to handle conversions that result in negative lightness? (#9484) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Interaction between font-synthesis-style and variable fonts (#9391) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] I18n self-review checklist (#5030) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] I18n self-review checklist (#5030) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust and font metrics overrides (#8967) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] HEX Color Opacity Handling (#6880) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping] Publish an updated WD (#6370) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Converting out of gamut colors to `hsl` can result in negative saturation with the sample code (#9222) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] Time for FPWD? (#9799) (Friday, 2 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport-1] Time for FPWD? (#9799) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Resolving and serializing the opacity property (#8311) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Thursday, 1 February)

Chris Rebert via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] Selectors for “text-ish” and “button-ish” inputs (#2296) (Thursday, 15 February)

Chris Wilson via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [Contributing.md] Suggestion to improve the contribution best practices (#9928) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [Contributing.md] Suggestion to improve the contribution best practices (Friday, 9 February)

Christoph Päper via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5][various] Better handling of arguments with commas (#9539) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New selector to facilitate utility classes (`[name~^=value]`? `.prefix-*`?) (#10001) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Making design system first-class citizens (#9999) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-speech][css-sfx, css-audio, css-sound?] Ambient audio and sound effects (#9975) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors] Selectors for “text-ish” and “button-ish” inputs (#2296) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Allow authors do define custom `color-scheme` values. (#9660) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Ellipsizing of text in middle of string (#3937) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] Why is there no font-weight `light`? (#4048) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 1 February)

Christopher Cameron via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] Add CSS property to limit dynamic range of HDR content (#9074) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Christopher Kirk-Nielsen via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)

Clqsin45 via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-inline-3] Question about the relationship among `text-box-trim`, `text-box-edge` and `text-line-edge`. (#10007) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-inline-3] Question about the relationship among `text-box-trim`, `text-box-edge` and `text-line-edge`. (#10007) (Tuesday, 27 February)

CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Should not cq units be interpreted in the flatDom context? (#7947) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders] accept "px" for pixel values in `border-image-slice` (#6739) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Let B default to 1 in `round(<strategy>?, A, B)` (#9668) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Control whether an element is findable/searchable (Ctrl+F) (#3460) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts] Should `::part():lang()` and `::part():dir()` be valid? (#9795) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Enabling carousel design patterns in CSS (#9745) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [Meta][Editorial] Define bags of CSS properties to be referenced by allowlists (#9453) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] background-clip: border-area (#9456) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Make min and max value optional in `clamp()` (#9713) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Ensuring selection foreground/background contrast (#6150) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4][css-color-5] color-mix() and cross-fade() have different serialization order? (#9405) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] about:blank causes undesired flickering with dark color scheme. (#9624) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-hdr] Add CSS property to limit dynamic range of HDR content (#9074) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Preserve-3d + backface visibility semantics need to be clarified (#918) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms] `transform-box:stroke-box` with `vector-effect:non-scaling-stroke` creates a cyclical dependency (#9640) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-1] The computed value of `transform` if the transformed element is display:none (#9121) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Consider adding a programmatic way of resetting the visual viewport scale. (#9787) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport] [cssom] [css-typed-om] Consider adding a way of exposing the effective zoom. (#9809) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] improve styling of <details>/<summary> elements (#9879) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] `position-fallback-bounds` vs `position-container` (#9868) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allow more properties in position fallbacks (#9195) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Preserve the previously used fallback position when all fallbacks fail (#8200) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Alternative syntax for auto position fallback (#9196) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-inline-3] Negative margins on inline boxes (#8182) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-flow][cssom] How does avoiding floats affect margins? (#9174) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] What is the max-content width of a muticol container with only column-width:<length> (#9103) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Containing block of dialog fixed position children (#8040) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid][css-flexbox][quirks] Avoid percentage height quirk in new layout models (#5545) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-1] Track Sizing Algorithm question (#2873) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Resolved values of grid-template-rows/columns don't round-trip (#4475) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Support View Transitions on a DOM subtree (#9890) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][cssom] Clarify how `getComputedStyle` should be have with view-transition pseudo-elements (#9880) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Define what happens when an outbound cross-document view transition starts before rendering (#9822) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Timing for checking at-rule (#9867) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] What is the snapshot containing block for iframes? (#9786) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Handle startVT/cross-doc transitions when Document is hidden (#9543) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions] Transition to height (or width) "auto" (#626) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Implementations and spec disagree regarding content: url on elements (#2889) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] A proposal for controlling screen brightness (#6990) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] inteference with the caret blinking and the ability to animate its color (#9707) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] Align canonical order of `outline` sub-properties with `border` (#7700) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] What is the max-content width of a muticol container with only column-width:<length> (#9103) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] active vs inactive window states (#5828) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Detect physical keyboard (keyboard capable of shortcuts?) (#3871) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Ellipsizing of text in middle of string (#3937) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] subgrid obviates the need for `scrollbar-gutter: force` (#9815) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] overflow into the gutter (#5253) (Thursday, 8 February)

Dan Clark via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Tuesday, 27 February)

Daniel Holbert via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Preserve-3d + backface visibility semantics need to be clarified (#918) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Document the reason for excluding base styles from `position-try-order` (#9946) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Document the reason for excluding base styles from `position-try-order` (#9946) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid][css-flexbox][quirks] Avoid percentage height quirk in new layout models (#5545) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] overflow into the gutter (#5253) (Thursday, 8 February)

David Bokan via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] How should scroll timeline animations be treated? (#9901) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] How should scroll timeline animations be treated? (#9901) (Friday, 2 February)

DavidJCobb via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Wednesday, 14 February)

DavMila via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Specify Animation progress API (#9937) (Friday, 23 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [web-animations-2] Specify Animation progress API (Monday, 12 February)

Devon Govett via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)

Dominik Röttsches via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Tuesday, 13 February)

Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [css-fonts-5] Broken references in CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and 5 (#9965) (Thursday, 22 February)

dontcallmedom-bot via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] [css-fonts-5] Broken references in CSS Fonts Module Level 4 and 5 (#9965) (Thursday, 15 February)

Egor Kloos via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Sunday, 25 February)

Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Make CSSOM interface read-only (#10011) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Make CSSSupportsRule expose whether its condition is met (#4240) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] CQ vs shadow boundaries (#5984) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Should not cq units be interpreted in the flatDom context? (#7947) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] Add SnapEvent definition (#9515) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] Is linear() easing in a shippable state? (#7533) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] Document reasoning for property restrictions (#9961) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Preserve-3d + backface visibility semantics need to be clarified (#918) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Preserve-3d + backface visibility semantics need to be clarified (#918) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Resolved values of grid-template-rows/columns don't round-trip (#4475) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport] zoom and scroll propagation to the viewport. (#9911) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport] zoom and scroll propagation to the viewport. (#9911) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] Top layer containing block and scrollbar-gutter (#9904) (Saturday, 3 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow (#9903) (Saturday, 3 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow (#9903) (Saturday, 3 February)

Eric Portis via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms] Lifting or recessing elements from the viewport in 3D contexts (#9881) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms] Lifting or recessing elements from the viewport in 3D contexts (#9881) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Lifting or recessing elements from the viewport in 3D contexts (#9881) (Thursday, 1 February)

fantasai via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-align-3] Default safety of scroll containers (#10008) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Need ability to say "don't render" when anchor is off-screen (#7758) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] `anchor-size()` should fallback to `auto`, not zero (#10005) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Thursday, 22 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-align-3] Specifying justiy-self on block-level boxes wrt floats (#9963) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Need ability to say "don't render" when anchor is off-screen (#7758) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Allow anchoring to a particular fragment (#8895) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Popover positioning within a transformed anchor stacking context (#9705) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Last @try to display none? (#9380) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allow more properties in position fallbacks (#9195) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Select the fallback position where more content is visible, not the last (#9047) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1][css-page] Suggestion for predefined anchor constants and paged media specific non-element anchors (#8301) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor] Detecting active @position-fallback (#8171) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Ability of logical / physical combo positioning (#9268) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] `background` grammar is missing `<bg-clip>` (#9273) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-flexbox][align-items] Support for aligning items to the center of the first line. (#9854) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] The `text-spacing: auto` behavior should be made more predictable (#9857) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] text-autospace:punctuation link to "French typographic guidelines" is broken (#9906) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Republishing Tasks Permathread (#6900) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Implementations and spec disagree regarding content: url on elements (#2889) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-content] close-quote refers to wrong quote pair (#2506) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-content] close-quote refers to wrong quote pair (#2506) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] doesn't include C.2.86 from CSS2.1 (#2507) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] doesn't include C.2.86 from CSS2.1 (#2507) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] paragraph relating to negative quote depths from CSS2 is missing from CSS3 (#2038) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] paragraph relating to negative quote depths from CSS2 is missing from CSS3 (#2038) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Implementing content:none on elements is not web-compatible (#6503) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Friday, 2 February)

Fast-Nick via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] decide on :blank (#1967) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Florian Rivoal via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] The `text-spacing: auto` behavior should be made more predictable (#9857) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] overflow into the gutter (#5253) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] Add note about deviations from UAX-14 (#9997) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (#9842) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] line-clamp `max-lines` - support `auto` value to fit container (#9368) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-4] Typo fix (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between Bopomofo and Chinese characters (#9980) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between Hangul and Hanja (#9979) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] line-clamp `max-lines` - support `auto` value to fit container (#9368) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] Force render scrollbar thumb of overlay scrollbars (#9785) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between Hangul and Hanja (#9979) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] Hyphenate only overflowing words? (#616) (Monday, 19 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] subgrid obviates the need for `scrollbar-gutter: force` (#9815) (Monday, 19 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Prevent `pre` from inheriting hanging-punctuation by default with a user-agent style rule (#9689) (Monday, 19 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Line-end behavior of text-spacing-trim: space-first (#9736) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Line-end behavior of text-spacing-trim: space-first (#9736) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Disambiguation about soft wrap opportunities around replaced elements (#9964) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Disambiguation about soft wrap opportunities around replaced elements (#9964) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Include scrollbar gutter in #subgrid-edge-placeholders (#9935) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (#9842) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (#9842) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-align] `vertical-align: baseline`'s specced behavior when the box doesn't have a baseline isn't great for CJK (#9931) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [Contributing.md] Suggestion to improve the contribution best practices (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `[css-media-5]` - `prefers-reduced-data` question: special behavior when turned off and on post page load? (#9475) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui-4] inteference with the caret blinking and the ability to animate its color (#9707) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] Flaws in the Spec for `scrollbar-color` (#9826) (Thursday, 8 February)

Frances Cornwall via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Make CSSOM interface read-only (#10011) (Wednesday, 28 February)

François Beaufort via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [mediaqueries-5] Add picture-in-picture display mode | issue #9260 (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Tuesday, 6 February)

François Daoust via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Fix "<pt-class-selector>" syntax (Thursday, 1 February)

François REMY via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Should animations use View Transitions as their backing mechanism? (by default or as an opt-in) (#9945) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)

Fuqiao Xue via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-4] Typo fix (Sunday, 25 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-text-4] Typo fix (Sunday, 25 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-text] Some comments on the categorization of scripts (#9984) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between Bopomofo and Chinese characters (#9980) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between Hangul and Hanja (#9979) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Tuesday, 13 February)

GermanJablo via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Proposal for a :hover-only pseudo class (#7544) (Tuesday, 13 February)

Guido Bouman via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap] Snap direction needed for snap-overflow (#5123) (Sunday, 4 February)

Guillaume via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [cssom-1] Simplify setting MediaList.mediaText (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Clarify which selectors can come after `::slotted()` and `::part()` (#8517) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Clarify which selectors can come after `::slotted()` and `::part()` (#8517) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-4] Add production rule for <opacity-value> (Wednesday, 21 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-color-4] Add production rule for <opacity-value> (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Ambiguous grammar of `animation-range` (#9264) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Can the non-functional `:host` be compound? And should `::part()` select within its own shadow root? (#9981) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-colors-4] Clarify whether RGB is additive or not (#9977) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] linkable definition of palette-mix() function (not <palette-mix()> type) (#9969) (Monday, 19 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-fonts-4] Fix markup #9969 (Monday, 19 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-fonts-4] Fix markup #9969 (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] linkable definition of palette-mix() function (not <palette-mix()> type) (#9969) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Parse-time clip of HSL negative saturation for modern syntax? (#9222) (Thursday, 15 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Should the parent rule be considered when validating a selector containing `&`? (#9943) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Missing restrictions of multi-valued feature values (#9926) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-fonts-4] Define CSSFontFeatureValuesRule.historicalForms (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-fonts-4] Define CSSFontFeatureValuesRule.historicalForms (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [Meta][Editorial] Define bags of CSS properties to be referenced by allowlists (#9453) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Exclude auto as custom ident for view-transition-name (#9895) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1] Serializing via cssText doesn't give url(<string>) (#9913) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Clarify maximum number of `<feature-value-names>` in `character-variant()` (#9311) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Fix outdated example featuring nested media queries (#6958) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax-3] Fix outdated example featuring nested media queries (#6958) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1] `CSSStyleSheet.replace[Sync]()` should parse rules according to CSS specs (#6995) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1] `CSSStyleSheet.replace[Sync]()` should parse rules according to CSS specs (#6995) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Saturday, 3 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Only accept declarations in `@view-transitions` (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Only accept declarations in `@view-transitions` (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Nit: remove extra leading colon before active-view-transition() pseudo class (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Require one or more custom ident for view-transition-class (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Require one or more custom ident for view-transition-class (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-1] Exclude auto as custom ident for view-transition-name (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-1] Exclude auto as custom ident for view-transition-name (Friday, 2 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] alen.gerzic.gmail.com (#9894) (Friday, 2 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] alen.gerzic@gmail.com (#9893) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Resolving and serializing the opacity property (#8311) (Friday, 2 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-1] Accept `<percentage>` in `shape-image-threshold` (#9884) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Resolving and serializing the opacity property (#8311) (Thursday, 1 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes-1] Accept `<percentage>` in `shape-image-threshold` (#9884) (Thursday, 1 February)

Harald via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] `scrollbar-width` should support custom measurements (#6263) (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] `scrollbar-width` should support custom measurements (#6263) (Friday, 9 February)

Henry Bley-Vroman via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

hyperlogos via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] `scrollbar-width` should support custom measurements (#6263) (Friday, 9 February)

Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] masonry-auto-flow has suprising default (#9988) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] masonry-auto-flow has suprising default (#9988) (Wednesday, 21 February)

Isaac Muse via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] gather use cases and examples for gamut mapping (#9966) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] gather use cases and examples for gamut mapping (#9966) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Jake Archibald via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] Complex easing/timing functions (#229) (Tuesday, 20 February)

James Stuckey Weber via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)

Jens Tangermann via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Jerry Green via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New pseudo-class that matches the current URL fragment (#6942) (Tuesday, 20 February)

jfkthame via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-5] font-size-adjust with missing metrics (#6384) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] text-autospace:punctuation link to "French typographic guidelines" is broken (#9906) (Monday, 5 February)

Joe Pea via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations] proposal idea: animating non-element JS objects, `ObjectKeyframeEffect` and `Animator` API, or similar (#9974) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations] proposal idea: animating non-element JS objects, `ObjectKeyframeEffect` and `Animator` API, or similar (#9974) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] - Custom Timing Functions in JavaScript (#1012) (Sunday, 18 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [web-animations] proposal idea: `ObjectKeyframeEffect` and `Animator` API, allowing animation of JS objects besides DOM element styles. (#9974) (Saturday, 17 February)

Joey Arhar via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Add `:open` or `:top-layer` pseudo class (#7319) (Friday, 9 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-position] User-agent styles for top layer transitions (#9912) (Monday, 5 February)

Johannes Odland via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] Ambiguous grammar of `animation-range` (#9264) (Monday, 19 February)

Joshua Lindquist via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Is reading-order-items the best name for this property? (#9921) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Proposed alternative syntax for reading order (#9923) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] testing support of properties and values with partial implementations (#3559) (Friday, 2 February)

jsnkuhn via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders-4] corner-shape: angle and partial borders (#9072) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-borders-4] corner-shape: angle and partial borders (#9072) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Monday, 5 February)

Justin Fagnani via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Multiple stylesheets per file (#5629) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Multiple stylesheets per file (#5629) (Monday, 26 February)

Justin GALLY via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color] HEX Color Opacity Handling (#6880) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Justin Kruger via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Transparent window (#7281) (Friday, 16 February)

Karl Dubost via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Clarify display for ::first-line and ::first-letter (#9958) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Keith Cirkel via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-om] Can we lift the restriction on constructed flag for adoptedStylesheets? (#10013) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [selectors-5] Add custom state pseudo-classes (Monday, 5 February)

Kevin Babbitt via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Thursday, 15 February)

Khushal Sagar via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Rename type to typeList for CSSViewTransitionRule (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Cross-fade should use linear blending (#9983) (Friday, 23 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Cross-fade should use linear blending (#9983) (Friday, 23 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Cross-fade should use linear blending (#9983) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Fix heading indentation (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] blocking effects of timeline-scope (#8915) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [view-transitions-1] Have the `-image-pair`, `-old`, and `-new` pseudos inherit `animation-delay` (#9817) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] How should scroll timeline animations be treated? (#9901) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Handle startVT/cross-doc transitions when Document is hidden (#9543) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Feature detection for VT cross-document (#9891) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Feature detection for VT cross-document (#9891) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Timing for checking at-rule (#9867) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Feature detection for VT cross-document (#9891) (Thursday, 1 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Support View Transitions on a DOM subtree (#9890) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Script event on old Document for cross-document ViewTransitions (#8785) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Script event on old Document for cross-document ViewTransitions (#8785) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Should ViewTransitions be triggered for reloads? (#8784) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Should ViewTransitions be triggered for reloads? (#8784) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)

Krzysztof Maczyński via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Make min and max value optional in `clamp()` (#9713) (Monday, 19 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] scrollLeft and scrollTop as CSS properties? (#9956) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [cssom] Remarks on addRule method specification (#9930) (Friday, 9 February)

Kyle Bansavage via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view-1] Provide onAnimationEnd callback in scrollIntoView options (#3744) (Thursday, 8 February)

L. David Baron via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-typed-om] inverting a type should preserve the percent hint (#10018) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Control whether an element is findable/searchable (Ctrl+F) (#3460) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Can the sizing algo be made to deal with this (#2356) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position][css-position] Fixing the animation problem (#9598) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Control whether an element is findable/searchable (Ctrl+F) (#3460) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries][color] dynamic-range is a really ambiguous term and doesn't mention it's about color (#9957) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Can the sizing algo be made to deal with this (#2356) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] improve styling of <details>/<summary> elements (#9879) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Naming transition mode property and values (#8939) (Friday, 9 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Naming transition mode property and values (#8939) (Friday, 9 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-writing-modes] The interaction between display:contents and unicode-bidi should be clearly defined and tested (#9897) (Friday, 2 February)

Lea Verou via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5][various] Better handling of arguments with commas (#9539) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Add a pseudo-element to style all highlight pseudo-elements (#9091) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Multiple stylesheets per file (#5629) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New selector to facilitate utility classes (`[name~^=value]`? `.prefix-*`?) (#10001) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Making design systems first-class citizens (#9999) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Multiple stylesheets per file (#5629) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values][css-variables][css-mixins] Generic fallback syntax for IACVT values (#9990) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-values][css-variables][css-mixins] Generic fallback syntax for IACVT values (#9990) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] gather use cases and examples for gamut mapping (#9966) (Friday, 16 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Requirements for light and dark colors returned by `contrast-color(<color>)` (#9970) (Friday, 16 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-6] `contrast-color()` MVP in Level 5 (#9166) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Ensuring selection foreground/background contrast (#6150) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Saturday, 10 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui?] Allow `<input>` and `<select>` to be sized by contents (#7552) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui?] Allow `<input>` and `<select>` to be sized by contents (#7552) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Thursday, 1 February)

Lev Solntsev via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Mark Hanna via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Element.animate could allow keyframes to come from CSS declaration (#2070) (Friday, 23 February)

Martijn Cuppens via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-null-keyword] `null` keyword (#9914) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Masaki Hara via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [cssom-1][css-color-4][css-color-5][css-color-6] Describe CSSOM serialization in terms of declared values rather than specified values, fix #9993 (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] "specified value" here would better be reworded as declared value (#9993) (Sunday, 25 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] "specified value" here would better be reworded as declared value (#9993) (Saturday, 24 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] spec refactoring idea: flat representation for pseudo-element interpretation (#9933) (Monday, 12 February)

Masayuki Nakano via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] The `text-spacing: auto` behavior should be made more predictable (#9857) (Thursday, 29 February)

Mason Freed via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Transitioning when the anchor element with a given name changes (#8181) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Popover positioning within a transformed anchor stacking context (#9705) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Grid-based anchoring syntax? (#9145) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-position] Add the “centering” behavior which is now defined as an example in the specs as something built-in (#8979) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Popover positioning within a transformed anchor stacking context (#9705) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Grid-based anchoring syntax? (#9145) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-position] Add the “centering” behavior which is now defined as an example in the specs as something built-in (#8979) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allow more properties in position fallbacks (#9195) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Preserve the previously used fallback position when all fallbacks fail (#8200) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Alternative syntax for auto position fallback (#9196) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allow more properties in position fallbacks (#9195) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Preserve the previously used fallback position when all fallbacks fail (#8200) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Alternative syntax for auto position fallback (#9196) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Transitioning when the anchor element with a given name changes (#8181) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Transitioning when the anchor element with a given name changes (#8181) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Automatic alignment / justification (#9269) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Anchor positioning proposal comparison (#9117) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 13 February)

Massimo Artizzu via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Matt Giuca via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Move the definition of display-mode back to APPMANIFEST. Closes #7306. (#7307) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Move the definition of display-mode back to APPMANIFEST. Closes #7306. (#7307) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Move the definition of display-mode back to APPMANIFEST. Closes #7306. (#7307) (Monday, 26 February)

Matthieu Dubet via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] [css-nesting] Figure out whether we're fine with "shifting up" bare declarations after rules (#8738) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting] Concern about combinatorial explosion (#2881) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Michael Puckett via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] input[type="range"] pseudo selector for current value (akin to aria-valuenow) (#6354) (Thursday, 15 February)

Michal Čaplygin via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust-1] Emojis in forced colors mode (#8064) (Friday, 16 February)

Miguel Rivas via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align][css-inline] Support for aligning items to the center of the first line. (#9854) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Mike Bremford via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)

Miriam Suzanne via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] CQ vs shadow boundaries (#5984) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] clarification of `:scope` matching in nested scopes (#9741) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] 'output of the cascade' typo in all levels of Cascading & Inheritance spec? (#9998) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-mixin] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] clarification of `:scope` matching in nested scopes (#9741) (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] view-transition-name determined by element (#8320) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Saturday, 3 February)

Morten Stenshorne via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-page-3] Page-based counters not working with forced breaks. (#4760) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-page] Spec doesn't match browsers on alignment of headers & footers (particularly vertical centering) (#5870) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-page-3] clarification on whether "page" applies to (and propagates up from) "only-child" block-level elements (#7235) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Shrink-to-fit multicol container (#5535) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Shrink-to-fit multicol container (#5535) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Shrink-to-fit multicol container (#5535) (Friday, 16 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] Shrink-to-fit multicol container (#5535) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-break][css-floats] Do fragments float independently? (#4434) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-page] Define serialization of CSSMarginRule (#9952) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-page] Define serialization of CSSPageRule (#9953) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-page] Define serialization of CSSPageRule (#9953) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-page] Define serialization of CSSPageRule (#9953) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [cssom] [css-page] Define serialization of CSSMarginRule (#9952) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Should serialization of @page selectors include "@page"? (#2643) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Murhaf Sousli via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Issues with ScrollTimeline and animating physical vs logical properties when using writing modes (#4350) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Natalie Weizenbaum via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] How to handle conversions that result in negative lightness? (#9484) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] How to handle conversions that result in negative lightness? (#9484) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 2 February)

Nathan Knowler via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade] allow a second value for the `all` property that is a list of exceptions (#9987) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Can the non-functional `:host` be compound? And should `::part()` select within its own shadow root? (#9981) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Can the non-functional `:host` be compound? And should `::part()` select within its own shadow root? (#9981) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-scoping-1][css-shadow-parts-1] Can the non-functional `:host` be compound? And should `::part()` select within its own shadow root? (#9981) (Tuesday, 20 February)

Nehuen Prados via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] [css-sizing] [sizing-values] Allow sizing values like @container burgermenu (width < min-width) (#9978) (Saturday, 24 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] [css-sizing] [sizing-values] Allow sizing values like @container burgermenu (max-width: max-content) (#9978) (Tuesday, 20 February)

Nick G via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)

Nicolas Stepien via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scrollbars] Flaws in the Spec for `scrollbar-color` (#9826) (Friday, 2 February)

Noam Rosenthal via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Make CSSOM interface read-only (#10011) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions] Make CSSOM interface read-only (#10011) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][cssom] Clarify how `getComputedStyle` should be have with view-transition pseudo-elements (#9880) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][cssom] Clarify how `getComputedStyle` should be have with view-transition pseudo-elements (#9880) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Timing for checking at-rule (#9867) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Timing for checking at-rule (#9867) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Resolve outbound transition promises after document unloads (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-1] Export an algorithm to skip a transition in a hidden document (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Define what happens when an outbound cross-document view transition starts before rendering (#9822) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Skip cross-document view-transitions when hidden or not-yet-revealed (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: Fix merge error from previous commit (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-1] Auto-skip a view-transition if document is hidden (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Amend specificity of view-transition pseudos with a class (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] view-transition-name determined by element (#8320) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Dealing with promises on old VT object (#9888) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Editorial: refactor L2 concerns out of L1 (#9892) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-1] Inherit to the UA stylesheet rules for animation-delay in vt pseudo-elements (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-view-transitions-2] Move `onReady` to the correct place and rename (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Update non-normative notes once `pageconceal` or so is upstreamed (#9886) (Thursday, 1 February)

Oliver Boermans via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)

Ophir Lifshitz via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Control whether an element is findable/searchable (Ctrl+F) (#3460) (Thursday, 15 February)

Oriol Brufau via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] masonry-auto-flow has suprising default (#9988) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors-4] Grammar of ns-prefix incorrect? (#10016) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors-4] Grammar of ns-prefix incorrect? (#10016) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors-4] Grammar of ns-prefix incorrect? (#10016) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5][various] Better handling of arguments with commas (#9539) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom] getComputedStyle and/or computedStyleMap to return authored value (#10002) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New selector to facilitate utility classes (`[name~^=value]`? `.prefix-*`?) (#10001) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-position] Static position needs to ignore floats (#9991) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] [css-sizing] [sizing-values] Allow sizing values like @container burgermenu (width < min-width) (#9978) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values][css-variables][css-mixins] Generic fallback syntax for IACVT values (#9990) (Friday, 23 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-position] Static position needs to ignore floats (#9991) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] [css-sizing] [sizing-values] Allow sizing values like @container burgermenu (max-width: max-content) (#9978) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Style feature parsing should disallow !important (#9986) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Style feature parsing should disallow !important (#9986) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] masonry-auto-flow has suprising default (#9988) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Can the sizing algo be made to deal with this (#2356) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Monday, 19 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-selector-for-is-attribute] Feature Request (#9973) (Sunday, 18 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align-3] Specifying justiy-self on block-level boxes wrt floats (#9963) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Clarify display for ::first-line and ::first-letter (#9958) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-selector-for-is-attribute] Feature Request (#9973) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Can the sizing algo be made to deal with this (#2356) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Ability to clamp track spanning (#5852) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align-3] Specifying justiy-self on block-level boxes wrt floats (#9963) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS2][CSSOM] Used value of margin properties (#2328) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-grid] Include scrollbar gutter in #subgrid-edge-placeholders (#9935) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-tables][css-backgrounds] Does background-clip work on table columns and rows? (#9916) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-null-keyword] `null` keyword (#9914) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-null-keyword] `null` keyword (#9914) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-null-keyword] `null` keyword (#9914) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a pseudo-class akin to :nth-child() (#9899) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-content] close-quote refers to wrong quote pair (#2506) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a pseudo-class akin to :nth-child() (#9899) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a pseudo-class akin to :nth-child() (#9899) (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Sunday, 4 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Thursday, 1 February)

Patrick H. Lauke via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Browser zoom unit for accessibility [css-values-and-units] (#6869) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Browser zoom unit for accessibility [css-values-and-units] (#6869) (Thursday, 29 February)

Paul Grenier via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-display-4] Anchor Positioning and Display Order (#9356) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-display-4] Anchor Positioning and Display Order (#9356) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-display-4] Anchor Positioning and Display Order (#9356) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Peter Arsenault via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add language about how the browser obtains prefers-color-scheme from the OS (#10015) (Thursday, 29 February)

Phil Cunliffe via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Philip Jägenstedt via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] linkable definition of palette-mix() function (not <palette-mix()> type) (#9969) (Friday, 16 February)

pyoor via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css-selectors-4] Grammar of ns-prefix incorrect? (#10016) (Thursday, 29 February)

r12a via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] text-autospace: what gets copied? (#8511) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-content] Quote character choice must depend on surrounding language, not language of the quotation (#5478) (Thursday, 8 February)

Rachel Andrew via GitHub

• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol] margin box of column-spanning element interrupt column content, including column-rule (#2579) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-multicol-1] Horizontal Review (#6103) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Do we need `reading-order: <integer>` or should `reading-order: auto` be allowable in all grid or flex layouts? (#8589) (Monday, 12 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Do we need `reading-order: <integer>` or should `reading-order: auto` be allowable in all grid or flex layouts? (#8589) (Monday, 12 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-multicol-1] Inlined a bunch of tests (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] drafting reading-order-items issue #8589 (#9845) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Proposed alternative syntax for reading order (#9923) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Should the reading-order-items property apply to tables in addition to flex and grid layouts? (#9922) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Is reading-order-items the best name for this property? (#9921) (Thursday, 8 February)

River via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Making a stickypos in a scroller also see the viewport edges (#8286) (Monday, 26 February)

Rob Buis via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Rob Resendez via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain] Similar to window.matchMedia(), Container Queries should have a similar method (#6205) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Robb Beal via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 16 February)

Robert Flack via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Specify Animation progress API (#9937) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Working with Scroll Driven Animations (#9379) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Enabling carousel design patterns in CSS (#9745) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap] Snap point selection when scrolling into view should try to make targeted element visible (#9917) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Robert Longson via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Thursday, 8 February)
• [csswg-drafts] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decoration] Clarify interaction between text-shadow, stroke, (partial or complete) color transparency, and element opacity (#8449) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Romain Menke via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] New selector to facilitate utility classes (`[name~^=value]`? `.prefix-*`?) (#10001) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] gather use cases and examples for gamut mapping (#9966) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)

Roman Komarov via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5][various] Better handling of arguments with commas (#9539) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-cascade-6] clarification of `:scope` matching in nested scopes (#9741) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Making a stickypos in a scroller also see the viewport edges (#8286) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-display-4] Anchor Positioning and Display Order (#9356) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-display-4] Anchor Positioning and Display Order (#9356) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor] Detecting active @position-fallback (#8171) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)

Rune Lillesveen via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain-3] Should not cq units be interpreted in the flatDom context? (#7947) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transitions-2] Should we make `@starting-style` resource-loading aware? (#9967) (Thursday, 15 February)

Sam Sneddon via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1] Serializing via cssText doesn't give url(<string>) (#9913) (Monday, 5 February)

Sanket Joshi via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Specify document.caretPositionFromPoint in shadow DOM scenario (#9932) (Wednesday, 21 February)

Scott Kellum via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Browser zoom unit for accessibility [css-values-and-units] (#6869) (Thursday, 29 February)

Sebastian Zartner via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-conditional] Make CSSSupportsRule expose whether its condition is met (#4240) (Thursday, 29 February)

Shaw Jia via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a pseudo-class akin to :nth-child() (#9899) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a pseudo-class akin to :nth-child() (#9899) (Monday, 5 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-values-5] toggle() should be a psuedo-class instead similar to :nth-child() (#9899) (Friday, 2 February)

Shiba via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Thursday, 8 February)

Shinyu Murakami via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] The `text-spacing: auto` behavior should be made more predictable (#9857) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] The `text-spacing: auto` behavior should be made more predictable (#9857) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Simon Fraser via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Detect physical keyboard (keyboard capable of shortcuts?) (#3871) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Simon Pieters via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Separate getBoundingClientRect algorithm from the public API (#5614) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Separate getBoundingClientRect algorithm from the public API (#5614) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-viewport] zoom and scroll propagation to the viewport. (#9911) (Tuesday, 6 February)

Siye Liu via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Specify document.caretPositionFromPoint in shadow DOM scenario (#9932) (Friday, 9 February)

Stephen Chenney via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] "Singular" vs "plural" pseudo-elements (#9968) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] Ensuring selection foreground/background contrast (#6150) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [CSS Pseudo] Revisit CSS Custom Properties in highlight pseudos (#9909) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Adopt triage Service-Level Objectives (SLOs) (#9820) (Monday, 5 February)

Steve Orvell via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] Allow mixins/functions to be called via custom properties (#10006) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Pseudo class to indicated when a slot has content (#6867) (Thursday, 22 February)

szager-chromium via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] #8649 Describe ink overflow from hanging glyphs (#9842) (Sunday, 25 February)

Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-typed-om] inverting a type should preserve the percent hint (#10018) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-typed-om] inverting a type should preserve the percent hint (#10018) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] specification for calc() should be clearer about when the result has a percentage (#10017) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CONTRIBUTING.md] Clarify that PRs should originate from your own fork (#10009) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] `anchor-size()` should fallback to `auto`, not zero (#10005) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Add 'anchor-default' to the list of allowed @position-try properties (#9950) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-positioning] Anchor positioning spec is hard to read (#8869) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-positioning] Anchor positioning spec is hard to read (#8869) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Allow smooth transitioning between fallback positions (#8372) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Allow smooth transitioning between fallback positions (#8372) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Tree-scoped references don't play nicely with transition styles (#8180) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Tree-scoped references don't play nicely with transition styles (#8180) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Using a specific box (not your CB) to determine position-fallback (#8724) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Using a specific box (not your CB) to determine position-fallback (#8724) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allowing to explicitly define the containing block for inset-area (#9662) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Allowing to explicitly define the containing block for inset-area (#9662) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Do we need area-list fallback position syntax? (#9270) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Clarifying serialization of negative zero and expression simplification (#9750) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Rename `anchor-default` to `position-anchor` (#10004) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Layered positioning (#9816) (Monday, 26 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Including the base styles in the reorderable fallbacks (#10003) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] One of the spec examples has a `anchor-element` mention that's getting interpreted as an HTML element and hence isn't visible (#8973) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] One of the spec examples has a `anchor-element` mention that's getting interpreted as an HTML element and hence isn't visible (#8973) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-pseudo] Should we allow anchoring things to more pseudo-elements? (#8615) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1][css-pseudo] Should we allow anchoring things to more pseudo-elements? (#8615) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Reusing the implicit anchor name on the nested elements (#8913) (Monday, 26 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Reusing the implicit anchor name on the nested elements (#8913) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain][css-anchor-position-1] Should size/layout containment also contain anchor names? (#9349) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values][css-variables][css-mixins] Generic fallback syntax for IACVT values (#9990) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Allow authors do define custom `color-scheme` values. (#9660) (Friday, 16 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo-4] "Singular" vs "plural" pseudo-elements (#9968) (Thursday, 15 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] "slide" an element to keep it in its IMCB (#9960) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Channel clipping breaks author expectations, especially when using 'perceptually uniform' spaces (#9449) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] scrollLeft and scrollTop as CSS properties? (#9956) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] scrollLeft and scrollTop as CSS properties? (#9956) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] (re)Introduce the CSS-WG to Warichu (#9520) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Add 'anchor-default' to the list of allowed @position-try properties (#9950) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Document the reason for excluding base styles from `position-try-order` (#9946) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Select the fallback position where more content is visible, not the last (#9047) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Select the fallback position where more content is visible, not the last (#9047) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Should the parent rule be considered when validating a selector containing `&`? (#9943) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Should the parent rule be considered when validating a selector containing `&`? (#9943) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-nesting-1] Clarify valid position of `&` in a selector (#9940) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-mixins] custom mixins & functions should have some access to custom properties on the calling element. How much? (#9938) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Last @try to display none? (#9380) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4] Move serialization of `<color>` and `<alpha-value>` (#9798) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Missing letter in example 3 (#9180) (Friday, 9 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Missing letter in example 3 (#9180) (Friday, 9 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] Heading case inconsistencies (#9179) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Last @try to display none? (#9380) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-contain][css-anchor-position] Anchor names should be contained by style containment (#9100) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Select the fallback position where more content is visible, not the last (#9047) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decoration] Clarify interaction between text-shadow, stroke, (partial or complete) color transparency, and element opacity (#8449) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] Ellipsizing of text in middle of string (#3937) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Should the reading-order-items property apply to tables in addition to flex and grid layouts? (#9922) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] Proposed alternative syntax for reading order (#9923) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-4] drafting reading-order-items issue #8589 (#9845) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Need ability to say "don't render" when anchor is off-screen (#7758) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Better handle an inset-area edge case when the default anchor element is partially or completely outside the containing block (#9663) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Better handle an inset-area edge case when the default anchor element is partially or completely outside the containing block (#9663) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Add display-mode for document picture-in-picture (#9260) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds-4] Is the `text` value part of `background-clip` or not?? (#9907) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-scroll-snap-2] Add SnapEvent definition (#9515) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Monday, 5 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-backgrounds] - Reappeal for Background Alpha's or Background Opacity | extremely useful for CMS's (#9910) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-4] Define stretch sizing properly, rather than (incorrectly) indirecting thru stretch alignment. (#9902) (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] Pull Request: [css-sizing-4] Define stretch sizing properly, rather than (incorrectly) indirecting thru stretch alignment. (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] inconsistency for fallback behavior for space-{around,evenly} (#9858) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] CSS flexibility for `path()`s (and let’s fix paths while we’re at it?) (#9889) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Alternative syntax for auto position fallback (#9196) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Thursday, 1 February)

Temani Afif via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: CSS Variable Groups (as a solution to several design systems pain points) (#9992) (Saturday, 24 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shapes] Allow optional rounding parameter for `polygon()` (#9843) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Theresa O'Connor via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [css2][css-align] `vertical-align: baseline`'s specced behavior when the box doesn't have a baseline isn't great for CJK (#9931) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values-4] Switch advanced attr() to being var()-like (#4482) (Friday, 9 February)

Thomas Di Grégorio via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Tuesday, 27 February)

Tim Nguyen via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Sunday, 25 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Clarify the list of pseudo-elements that can be followed with `:only-child` (#9996) (Sunday, 25 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 21 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] `::details-content` vs `details::part(content)` (#9951) (Saturday, 17 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Rename `:active-view-transition()` pseudo-class (#9972) (Saturday, 17 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Masonry - align-tracks / justify-tracks potentially not desirable for accessibility. (#8207) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Masonry - align-tracks / justify-tracks not defined sufficiently - has issues with spanning items (#8208) (Friday, 16 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Masonry - align-tracks / justify-tracks not defined sufficiently - has issues with spanning items (#8208) (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-adjust] Allow authors do define custom `color-scheme` values. (#9660) (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] Static position of abspos top layer elements inside fixed pos. (#9939) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Exclude auto as custom ident for view-transition-name (#9895) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Clarify scope of implementation-defined behavior for native appearance (and primitive appearance) (#9919) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] User-agent styles for top layer transitions (#9912) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position] User-agent styles for top layer transitions (#9912) (Monday, 5 February)

Todd Padwick via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Ignore offscreen elements from participating in transitions (#8282) (Monday, 19 February)

Tomas via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-easing-2] Complex easing/timing functions (#229) (Tuesday, 20 February)

Una Kravets via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] "slide" an element to keep it in its IMCB (#9960) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] `position-fallback-bounds` vs `position-container` (#9868) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Can we clarify the `inset-area` syntax? It can be confusing to read and reason about. (#9862) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Reinterpret viewport positioned (fixed, sticky) elements wrt virtual keyboard (#7475) (Thursday, 8 February)

vmpstr via GitHub

• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] `CSSViewTransitionRule.type` overrides deprecated `CSSRule.type` (#9905) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Need ability to say "don't render" when anchor is off-screen (#7758) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1][cssom] Clarify how `getComputedStyle` should be have with view-transition pseudo-elements (#9880) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Cross-fade should use linear blending (#9983) (Friday, 23 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Media query for enclosed screens (#9701) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Is the "more verbose" syntax possible? (#9944) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Is the "more verbose" syntax possible? (#9944) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Is the "more verbose" syntax possible? (#9944) (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Last @try to display none? (#9380) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [scroll-animations-1] blocking effects of timeline-scope (#8915) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Friday, 2 February)
• [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Specificity of view transition pseudos with classes (#9887) (Thursday, 1 February)

W3C Bot via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-1][css-color-4][css-color-5][css-color-6] Describe CSSOM serialization in terms of declared values rather than specified values, fix #9993 (#9995) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-color-4] Add production rule for <opacity-value> (#9985) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Fix markup #9969 (#9976) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts-4] Define CSSFontFeatureValuesRule.historicalForms (#9925) (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Nit: remove extra leading colon before active-view-transition() pseudo class (#9898) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-1] Exclude auto as custom ident for view-transition-name (#9895) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-view-transitions-2] Only accept declarations in `@view-transitions` (#9900) (Friday, 2 February)

Walrus via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-transforms-2] Should perspective on root propagate to viewport? (#5781) (Saturday, 3 February)

Westbrook Johnson via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Multiple stylesheets per file (#5629) (Monday, 26 February)

Wii via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Proposal: Custom CSS Functions & Mixins (#9350) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Xianzhu Wang via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor] Interaction between `anchor-scroll` and `position: sticky` is not well defined (#8448) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Scroll adjustment doesn't work for chain of anchor-positioned elements (#9071) (Thursday, 29 February)

Xiaocheng Hu via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [CSS Import Once] @import-once, or some syntax for importing a stylesheet only once (#6130) (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-1] Transitioning when the anchor element with a given name changes (#8181) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position] `anchor-size()` should fallback to `auto`, not zero (#10005) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-position-3] Making a stickypos in a scroller also see the viewport edges (#8286) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Monday, 26 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] input[type="range"] pseudo selector for current value (akin to aria-valuenow) (#6354) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Specify document.caretPositionFromPoint in shadow DOM scenario (#9932) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] Can we reinstate `<number-percentage>` and friends? (#9955) (Tuesday, 20 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-display-3] Clarify display for ::first-line and ::first-letter (#9958) (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [mediaqueries-5] Detect physical keyboard (keyboard capable of shortcuts?) (#3871) (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] SVG only CSS text properties should not apply to ::placeholder, but should apply to ::first-line/::first-letter (#9918) (Thursday, 8 February)

Yair Even Or via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] line-clamp `max-lines` - support `auto` value to fit container (#9368) (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Closed: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-4] line-clamp `max-lines` - support `auto` value to fit container (#9368) (Wednesday, 14 February)

Yasuo Kida （木田泰夫） via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] text-autospace: what gets copied? (#8511) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-4] text-autospace: what gets copied? (#8511) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text][text-spacing] Extra spacing between ideographs and non-fullwidth punctuation/symbols (#9479) (Thursday, 15 February)

Yehonatan Daniv via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [web-animations-2] Progress APIs (#8799) (Thursday, 29 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations-2] Declarative syntax for GroupEffects (#9554) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-animations-2] Declarative syntax for GroupEffects (#9554) (Saturday, 24 February)

Yoav Weiss via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images] image-orientation:none violates same-origin policy (#5165) (Thursday, 15 February)

一丝 via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-grid-3] Renaming `masonry` keyword (#9733) (Thursday, 22 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ui] Remove appearance: slider-vertical carefully (#8743) (Friday, 2 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-anchor-position-1] Alternative syntax for auto position fallback (#9196) (Thursday, 1 February)

Šime Vidas via GitHub

• [csswg-drafts] [indexes] `property-name` should probably not be in the list of properties (#9982) (Tuesday, 20 February)

Сергей via GitHub

• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)
• Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-properties-values-api] Shorthand for custom property declaration (#7523) (Tuesday, 27 February)

Last message date: Thursday, 29 February 2024 23:51:59 UTC