- From: jfkthame via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 14:52:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
In the related issue #2818, @upsuper commented: > But similar to @jensimmons in #4277 (comment) I personally think `all` is better than `always` as well. The `all` here implies that we apply the skip-ink to all characters touching underline / overline, overriding browser heuristic of conditional applying. And indeed pairing `none` with `always` doesn't feel very sensible. I'm also inclined to agree with this; `none | auto | always` feels awkward. It should be either `never | auto | always` or `none | auto | all`, and given that we've already shipped `none | auto`, we can't really go for `never` instead of `none`. So before we go ahead and implement this (which I think we're ready to do more-or-less immediately), can we please reconsider making the new value `all`? Thanks. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jfkthame Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4277#issuecomment-579282812 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2020 14:52:50 UTC