- From: David Bradbury via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 17:08:38 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@Loirooriol - Good points, updated the maths. @Crissov - I think my only concern with only implementing random sets by itself is that invariably someone will end up needing to list something out like `random(0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5... 358, 359)` or similar. That said, it's certainly better than no implementation (And the more likely hack that's less verbose is to random() a sufficient list of decimals and multiply that in a calc() function). It's mentioned in #4688 that > random() can't be done; it's a totally different topic. Is there anywhere that expands on that? -- GitHub Notification of comment by DavidBradbury Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2826#issuecomment-578217439 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 24 January 2020 17:08:39 UTC