- From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 20:23:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I like @MatsPalmgren's approach to reuse the already established grid layout for that. Though I agree with @argyleink, @meyerweb, @AmeliaBR, and @rachelandrew, that masonry is rather something between flex and grid, which, while sharing logic with both of them, deserves its own display type and properties. The approach of masonry is different than the one of grid, as its idea is to minimize the gaps between different pieces. By making its layout be based on grid, we restrict both of them in their future extensibility. That doesn't mean that masonry shouldn't borrow concepts and algorithms of grid layout or flexbox, though. It is just not exactly one or the other. Sebastian -- GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4650#issuecomment-577368884 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 22 January 2020 20:23:20 UTC