Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-align] editorial: typos in §10. Appendix A: Static Position Terminology (#3548)

> Is the plural "positions" intentional?

Yes. See [CSS2 10.3.7](https://drafts.csswg.org/css2/visudet.html#abs-non-replaced-width), which defines a static position for each inset property.

> [link, period, link, link]

Fixed.

> [instead]

It can go on either side, but sure, we moved it to the end.

> [pointing to CSS2.2]

We've updated the links to point to /TR/CSS2. This does need repub, tho.

> "a inline"

fixed

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3548#issuecomment-572743705 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 9 January 2020 20:36:45 UTC