- From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:51:04 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Some concrete examples where implementations seem to disagree. How do the following serialize? - ``min(1)``: ``min(1)`` or ``1``? - ``min(1, 2)``: ``min(1, 2)`` or ``1``? - ``min(min(1))``: ``min(min(1))``, ``min(1)`` or ``1``? - ``calc(min(1))``: ``calc(min(1))``, ``min(1)`` or ``1`` or other? Questions: 1. Should simplification ever remove all the math functions? 2. Should nested math functions of different types be simplified, i.e. is it OK to simplify ``calc(calc(1))`` but not ``calc(min(1))`` @tabatkins the note at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-values-4/#calc-serialize says this is under discussion, but is there anything more recent than 2016? -- GitHub Notification of comment by smfr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4505#issuecomment-554223009 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 15 November 2019 05:51:06 UTC