Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-sizing-3] Rename spec to CSS Box Sizing (#3962)

The CSS Working Group just discussed `Rename spec to CSS Box Sizing`, and agreed to the following:

* `RESOLVED: remane Box Intrinsic Sizing to Box Sizing with no change in shortname`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Rename spec to CSS Box Sizing<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3962<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: When we first drafted this spec it was limited but now it has all box sizing so should rename<br>
&lt;florian> +1<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Reasonable. Other opinions?<br>
&lt;dael> AmeliaBR: No change to shortname?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Still css-sizing<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: A little worried about confusion with box sizing property.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Which is in this spec<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: But it's a lot more.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Happy for other suggestions, but need to remove intrinsic and extrinsic from title<br>
&lt;dael> AmeliaBR: CSS sizing too general?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I think so<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Box Alignment and Box Sizing go together<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I think box sizing is great. Point about confusion is well taken, but prop is in the spec. I don't think it will cause too much confusion<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Unless there's better names lets resolve<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Obj to remane Box Intrinisic Sizing to Box Sizing with no change in shortname?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: remane Box Intrinsic Sizing to Box Sizing with no change in shortname<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3962#issuecomment-497002003 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 29 May 2019 16:06:07 UTC