Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow-3] 'overflow' 2-value syntax is in wrong order (#2988) from andruud via GitHub on 2019-05-24 (public-css-archive@w3.org from May 2019)

From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 09:35:14 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-495543408-1558690513-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

So, wait, this means `overflow` now has _two_ shorthand expansions associated with it, depending on whether the 1-value syntax or 2-value syntax is used? I agree with @emilio that this is unfortunate.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by andruud
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2988#issuecomment-495543408 using your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 24 May 2019 09:35:15 UTC