- From: Oriol Brufau via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 22:58:48 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> what, specifically, is not clear? Well, it seems the definition is excluding element-generated non-principal boxes for some reason. And it's not clear whether this is intentional. Like if you have a `<tbody>` which is a children of a `<table>`, the definition implies that the parent box of the table-row-group box is the table wrapper box instead of the table grid box. > it's not otherwise defined how the boxes are related into a tree OK, it seems what you are trying to impose is > In the box tree, the boxes generated by an element are descendants of the principal box of any ancestor elements. I would prefer something like that: it's not a concept definition but an instruction for the tree construction, and has no vague exception. Sure, it's still not completely detailed, but this can't be done in a single sentence. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Loirooriol Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3158#issuecomment-493259290 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 16 May 2019 22:58:49 UTC