- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 23:57:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
#3686 is explicitly about the _initial value_ - it even says so in the subject. So I don't see how the resolution can be interpreted in any other way than being about the computed value. (You are of course free to reverse that resolution here, but I don't see why given that it's less than two weeks ago it was discussed). Fwiw, I don't feel that strongly either way. I just think a computed value is a more honest way to do it. It makes it explicit for authors to see rather being something magic that happens at used-value time, unless they specify an increment. Also, a computed value makes it possible to inherit (not saying that's a particularly useful feature or anything, just that "it works normally" is nice). -- GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3769#issuecomment-476901702 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2019 23:57:37 UTC