- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:02:26 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I donʼt feel strongly about this and understand the surprising effects it would have. It was a weak attempt to justify more convenience functions like `cbrt()`. (`squared(A)` is actually longer than `pow(A, 2)`, but more readable in some cases.) Why would `pow(-8, 1/3)` ever return NaN? JS is strange. CSS should not copy the strangeness. As for transformation matrices equivalent to `translation(var(--aLength))`, I now realize that `calc(var(--aLength) / 1px)` would have sufficed to get a number that is really pixels. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3764#issuecomment-476870521 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2019 22:02:27 UTC