- From: Ilya Streltsyn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 12:37:58 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm afraid that _any_ design of the feature like `display:contents` (aptly dubbed `display: schrodinger-cat;` in the discussion:) couldn't completely avoid any confusion. But the proposed solution looks significantly less confusing for users and authors than the existing implementations, and thus better conforming to the Priorities of Constituencies principle. > case-by-case decision-making regarding which aspects of a box matter and which don't As far as I understand, it's not the change in "which _aspects of the box_ matter", it's "which _boxes_ matter" that is changing. When the element clearly _has a visible and interactive box tree,_ making the closest visible boxes in that tree matter instead of _the only absent box_ in it makes much sense for me. -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3323#issuecomment-499868621 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 June 2019 12:37:59 UTC