Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors] Let :is() have better error-recovery behavior than normal Selectors (#3264)

We haven't discussed what dev tools, etc., should show when the author provided `:is(:nonsense)`. Do people prefer `:is()` or `:is(:not(*))`? This might not be a spec issue.


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by ewilligers
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3264#issuecomment-463037648 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2019 03:03:35 UTC