- From: Shaw via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 15:16:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Consistency with nth-child would be good. On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:14 AM Oriol Brufau <notifications@github.com> wrote: > animation-delay: calc( 2s * ( var(--sibling-index) / var(--sibling-count) ) ); > > This assumes that the index is 0-based. I would prefer it to be 1-based > for consistency with nth-child. > Also, be aware that if you only have 1 child, you will have a 0/0 division. > I would argue that index-1-based / parent-children-count would be safer, > and not getting 0 for the 1st child doesn't seem a big problem. > > — > You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4559?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAF5XQ252NMNIU342LC5ZELQXELE7A5CNFSM4JVMOSQKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEGBBG7A#issuecomment-562172796>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF5XQ7AEQWJPGJVVKOIZCLQXELE7ANCNFSM4JVMOSQA> > . > -- GitHub Notification of comment by shshaw Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/4559#issuecomment-562173713 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 December 2019 15:16:33 UTC