- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 00:01:24 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Fwiw the only reason I would argue to add appearance is that it is bad for developer ergonomics that appearance: none (which is useful addition to the platform) has to be prefixed; eventually features should be unprefixed if possible to make developers' work easier. Strong agreement here. I really don't want to get in the habit of telling people "oh, just use the webkit version, no unprefixed property is required". If there is agreement that this property has value to the web platform, that it is something whose use shouldn't be discouraged, that support is about more than just legacy compat, then it should have a prefix-free name. Also, there are still many developers who are confused / surprised to discover that `-webkit-` properties work at all outside WebKit/Blink browsers. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3024#issuecomment-421189087 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 14 September 2018 00:01:55 UTC