- From: Ilya Streltsyn via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:55:49 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Doesn't the phrase "its _most specific argument_" (implying that this functional pseudo-class takes _several_ arguments) technically contradict the phrase "a functional pseudo-class taking a selector list as its _argument_" from the definition (implying that the selector list as a whole is considered a _single_ argument)? Maybe it would be better to reuse the phrase "the most specific complex selector in its selector list argument" in the definition of `:matches()`, for consistency with the definition of `:nth-*-child(... of S)` and with the section about the specificity calculation? -- GitHub Notification of comment by SelenIT Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1027#issuecomment-433850379 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 29 October 2018 09:55:51 UTC