Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-images-4] minor error in Conic Gradients example (#3355)

Oh gosh, sorry, I'm forgetting how my own spec works.

Chrome isn't using the diagonal, but it *is* correctly using the default gradient-shape size of "farthest-corner", which sizes the gradient shape so that 100% is at the corner. So yeah, the spec example is wrong and needs to specify `closest-side`.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3355#issuecomment-443027335 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 29 November 2018 23:05:28 UTC