- From: HE Shi-Jun via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 03:35:55 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@tabatkins You may misunderstand my `x:is(extends-x)` sample, it's not current `:matches()`, but a selector to match `is` attribute for custom elements. I create this issue because these two usage are obviously have conflict. As my first comment suggest, we may need special `is` attr selector instead of `[is=extends-x]` because of the zero specificity use cases. Of coz we can use `x:where([is=extends-x])`, but it's a little clumsy and annoying for common use cases. @ExE-Boss The question may be, if we can redesign CSS, should we drop `.foo` and ask everyone use `[class~=foo]` instead? -- GitHub Notification of comment by hax Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/3327#issuecomment-439762063 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 19 November 2018 03:35:57 UTC