- From: Emilio Cobos Álvarez via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2018 01:55:53 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
If you use `animation-name: inherit` across shadow boundaries it copies the `m_styleScopeOrdinal` member, even though it means a different thing. Simplest test-case would be something like:
```html
<!doctype html>
<style>
#host {
animation: myanim 10s infinite;
}
</style>
<div id="host"></div>
<script>
host.attachShadow({ mode: "open" }).innerHTML = `
<style>
@keyframes myanim {
from { background: red; }
to { background: red; }
}
#inner {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: green;
animation: inherit;
}
</style>
<div id="inner"></div>
`;
</script>
```
Which shows red. In this case it doesn't seem like a big deal because we're using just the shadow tree rules, but I think I can come up with more confusing test-cases involving nested slots.
--
GitHub Notification of comment by emilio
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1995#issuecomment-385842321 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2018 01:56:02 UTC