Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-pseudo] Add stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties

The Working Group just discussed `Add stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: add stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties`
* `RESOLVED: clarify stroke properties effect ink overflow and not layout`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: Add stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2362<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: What do people think?<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: I agree they should be added, as I said on the thread.<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> +1<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Other opinions?<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Objections to adding stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Does stroke-width effect layout advances?<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: No, that's what fantasai added for clairification.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: When you highlight some tex with super big stroke-width it could go outside of the highlight?<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: Yes<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yes.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: That's okay. Thumbs up.<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: add stroke-color and stroke-width to the list of highlight properties<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: We should also resolve that strokes add ink overflow not scrollable overflow.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: I thought that was the case.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: It's a separate resolution that they shouldn't apply<br>
&lt;dael> myles: So why not put that with the width property and not highlight styling.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Ye, I think it's not clear.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Prop: clarify stroke properties effect ink overflow and not layout<br>
&lt;ChrisL> +1<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: clarify stroke properties effect ink overflow and not layout<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: When do the properties effect anything when used on one of these highlight pseudo elements?<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Most of these pseudo elements style text. Does stroke by default apply to text?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Yes.<br>
&lt;fantasai> https://drafts.fxtf.org/fill-stroke/ applies it to text<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Is that impl today or something you're imagining will work?<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Webkit is impl<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Edge shipped a long time ago.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: There was a webkit specific property that did that which people used before standardization.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: So it derives from earlier experience.<br>
&lt;dael> dbaron: Sure, Iw as worried pages would do unexpectedd things, but if edge is shipping that's not the case.<br>
&lt;dael> ChrisL: Initial value means you shouldn't get a surprise unles syou set it.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: And I don't believe there's much uptake on the web currently.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen: Anything else on that topic dbaron or myles ?<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Not from me.<br>
&lt;dbaron> s/Webkit is impl/Webkit is implementing it/<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2362#issuecomment-373094168 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 14 March 2018 16:50:55 UTC