- From: Brian Birtles via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 23:17:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> It should probably be rewritten to focus on whether or not the property is animatable, as defined in CSS Transitions (factoring in the current definition of "animatable" as separate from "interpolate-able"). This is the part that needs to happen in V&U. That is, the long term plan is that every property has an "Animation type" field (currently still called "Animatable" in some specs) and the definition of that type links either to a common definition in V&U or to a local definition in that spec. The following properties, however, will have "Animation type: Not animatable": * `animation-*` (and shorthand) * `transition-*` (and shorthand) * `display` -- GitHub Notification of comment by birtles Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2736#issuecomment-394529978 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 4 June 2018 23:17:20 UTC