- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 02:09:47 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Here's some notes from the CSS2.1 cycle that I found with a quick search: - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Nov/0278.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0001.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0186.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jun/0404.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2007JulSep/0089.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2005AprJun/0149.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2005AprJun/0145.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2005AprJun/0144.html - https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-css-wg/2005AprJun/0139.html The spec used to define captions as having the table's parent as their containing block, and being sized that way. IIRC, for Web-compat reasons we had to change that. You can get the old behavior in the `top-outside` and `bottom-outside` keywords defined in a note and implemented in Mozilla, which had implemented captions per spec originally. Note that in non-Web publishing, having captions outside the width of the table is quite common. Not sure if that helps resolve the issue, but I figured I'd add some background info on the current situation. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/471#issuecomment-362766205 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 3 February 2018 02:09:48 UTC