- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2018 04:32:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think using CSS2 as a learning opportunity and a source of feature requests for bikeshed is a good idea, regardless of whether we actually convert it. CSS2 is a large spec, so it probably exercises the build tool quite extensively, and being able to write similar specs in bikeshed would be nice. I am not convinced the actual conversion is worth the effort, though. Because of that, if some of the feature requests we end up with look like weird quirks of 2.1 rather than generally useful features, I don't think bikeshed needs to bend over backwards to accommodate them. If we eventually get to the point where a bikeshed conversion becomes trivial, we can consider it then, but I don't think it would be all that bad if we never got to that point. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2220#issuecomment-381836679 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2018 04:32:36 UTC