- From: Majid Valipour via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2018 07:33:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@bgirard I had a chat with @astearns and a few others at CSSWG F2F yesterday. I am planning to join the WG as a member mainly to continue animation worklet specification as it moves to the working group. I had concerns around how much time I need to spend particularly for the weekly teleconferences. He confirmed that the expectation for editors of specs with limited scope is to simply attend such meetings only when there is an agenda item related to the specification. Agenda is posted in advance of the meeting which helps decide if attendance is needed. Most of the issues on specs don't need to be discussed on teleconference and will be resolved via github. This helped convince me that there is limited overhead in my case. Just wanted to share this in case it helps with your decision one way or another. -- GitHub Notification of comment by majido Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2179#issuecomment-380003330 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2018 07:33:10 UTC