- From: Sebastian Malton via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 00:07:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Any new information on when this might be discussed? I think that the best syntax would be ```css grid-column-gap: repeat(1 rem, 0 rem, 2 rem, 0 rem); ``` Where the pattern is repeated. One problem I do have is that you might want to have a fixed number of fixed widths and then have it repeating. Here there could be the following syntax: ```css grid-column-gap: group(fixed(1 rem, 5), repeat(1 rem, 0 rem), fixed(2 rem, 3)) ``` This syntax means the first 5 gaps have a width of 1rem, the last 3 gaps have a width of 2rem and the intervening gaps are switching between a width of 1rem and 0. With this syntax it can be `group(fixed(), repeat())`, or `group(fixed(), repeat(), fixed())`, or `group(repeat(), fixed())`, or `repeat()`. If there are less gaps then there are defined in the supplied `fixed` then the widths from the first are prioritized -- GitHub Notification of comment by Nokel81 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1659#issuecomment-378437971 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2018 00:07:41 UTC