Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-shadow-parts] decide on forwarding micro-syntax for partmap

I know you don't but I don't really see any consensus on the alternative,
so I'm just leaving that alone for now since it's a tiny change and will
have minimal impact on the implemention.

Could you point to some examples of specs that clearly distinguish the two
kinds of attributes? I'm new to this, so pointing to good examples would be
very helpful.




On Sun, Apr 1, 2018, 16:32 Ryosuke Niwa <notifications@github.com> wrote:

> Again, I don't think we should have => in the map. Also, we should
> distinguish content attribute and IDL attribute explicitly. It's totally
> unclear which one that spec is talking about.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-377768803>,
> or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEDu5wKI0NmIJeVyjsBb7nv8AbVtmnh6ks5tkIKIgaJpZM4SfykO>
> .
>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by fergald
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/2411#issuecomment-377772165 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 1 April 2018 08:41:14 UTC