Re: [csswg-drafts] [cssom-view] Doubts regarding the overflow directions description

The `sideways-lr` and `sideways-rl` are deferred to L4, not removed, and @anawhj is right that in `sideways-lr` the inline direction is bottom-to-top that the overflow direction is different.

Maybe we want to refer to [Abstract-to-Physical Mappings](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-writing-modes-4/#logical-to-physical) and use logical terms, such as "block-end" and "inline-end"?

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1569#issuecomment-330729117 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 20 September 2017 02:41:56 UTC