- From: inoas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 06:40:31 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
- 👍 for `:is()` as a pendent to `:not()` on the same specificity level - so the authors have the freedom to respect strict specificity - 👍 for `:filter()` like `:matches()` without specificity - however maybe there can be a more general purpose way to disable/lower specificity of a selector/selector-part? -- GitHub Notification of comment by inoas Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1170#issuecomment-330444414 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 19 September 2017 06:40:23 UTC