Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-values] Radians considered useless without π

• From: CSS Meeting Bot via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
• Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:34:37 +0000
• To: public-css-archive@w3.org
• Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-329224600-1505320467-sysbot+gh@w3.org>

The Working Group just discussed `Radians considered useless without π`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: Close iss #309 no change`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> topic: Radians considered useless without π<br>
&lt;dael> github:  https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/309<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Looks like we want approval to close no change.<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: Basically the argument is you need pi to use radians, but we have turns to you can divide by 2 and use turns.<br>
&lt;fantasai> turns = TaURadiaNS<br>
&lt;bkardell_> :)<br>
&lt;dael> Chris: +1 for closing. I think it's very clear.<br>
&lt;dael> Chris: The reason we have radians is people can spit it straight out without converting to degrees first.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: And that there is no impl that wants to add makes me think we should close.<br>
&lt;florian> +1<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Obj to closing no change?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: Close iss #309 no change<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/309#issuecomment-329224600 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2017 16:34:32 UTC