- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 14:48:21 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> A case where we could get this result would be if the grid container itself had a fixed height. Yep, you're right that I missed the part of the algorithm that explains that we'll be using the fixed max track size, so that case is not an issue. Also if we go for the case where the row is `auto` but the grid container has `height: 250px` the issue is not present either, as due to the orthogonal item we do a 2nd pass and everything works as expected. I've been doing some experiments and it seems that it works as expected and I didn't find any case that breaks due to this. Of course this need more testing but it seems a good approach. It's always scary to touch the track sizing algorithm, but let's hope everything goes right. :smile: Regarding the prose, it seems there are 2 verbs together in: > This step **sizes expands** tracks -- GitHub Notification of comment by mrego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1150#issuecomment-328123508 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 14:48:16 UTC