- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 10:08:25 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I have documented interest in keywords for ISO paper sizes by some vendors in the initial message of this thread. Naturally, the interest is much stronger in print-centric products like Prince and AHF, while the large browser vendors with their screen-centric products do not care as much. Why does that not proof enough demand already? Since even browsers already support the limited set of standardized keywords, I believe that the cost of implementing the rest of the set would actually be negligible compared to the cost of arguing over their inclusion in the standard. 😉 -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/328#issuecomment-328063684 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 8 September 2017 10:08:23 UTC