Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-ruby] text-orientation of bopomofo annotation

[Reply](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0326.html) from @kojiishi:
> One confirmation; if we were to propose a change, should the first tone mark also included? From wikipedia[1], I understand Bopomofo does not use the first tone mark but Pinyin does.
>
> Better to include but not required for Bopomofo usages?
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bopomofo#Tonal_marks

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by upsuper
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1916#issuecomment-340309580 using your GitHub account

Received on Sunday, 29 October 2017 22:48:32 UTC