- From: J. S. Choi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 05:19:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Is there a particular reason why `:ws-only` would be unacceptable? It contains what would be a new abbreviation in CSS, but it is much pithier while remaining semantically ambiguous, from what I can tell. In addition, though perhaps less importantly, `:whitespace-only` is inconsistent with the already-introduced `white-space` CSS property, which considers “white space” to be a two-word phrase. (My apologies if this particular option has already been discussed; I could find no mention of “ws-only” in this GitHub repository, the www-style archives, or the web in general. I can only imagine the tedious bikeshedding that has been occurring for the past four-to-five years.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by js-choi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1967#issuecomment-348085443 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 30 November 2017 05:19:36 UTC