- From: Simon Fraser via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 05:08:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Erik said: > I found http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transforms/#svg-gradient-transform-pattern-transform slightly confusing, as normally presentation attributes can be specified on any svg element (see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/intro.html#TermPresentationAttribute). It seems the desire here is to break that convention, and regardless of the intention the behavior needs to be specified - to explicitly call out the difference(s) to other presentation attributes AND/OR to specify the order in which transform, patternTransform and gradientTransform are mapped if they're all specified on the same element. > It's possible that the SVG2 spec will need to be updated as well, see https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/styling.html#UsingPresentationAttributes, since with the section in the Transforms spec a given presentation attribute and the corresponding property may no longer share the same name. -- GitHub Notification of comment by smfr Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/919#issuecomment-342047971 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 6 November 2017 05:08:38 UTC