- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 16:24:30 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I'm opposed to `inclusive` and `exclusive`, btw - I think the words are above our desired complexity level, and even I, a CS/Math college grad, regularly have to pause for a moment to remember what each means whenever I use them. (This is why I suggested the `drop-*` pattern - it's simple and easy to understand what it does.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1301#issuecomment-310132428 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 21 June 2017 16:24:36 UTC