Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-overflow] FPWD as a dependency for [css-contain]

The CSS Working Group just discussed `FPWD as a dependency for [css-contain]`, and agreed to the following resolutions:

* `RESOLVED: moving the text for intreation between contain and overflow to level 4`

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  FPWD as a dependency for [css-contain]<br>
&lt;dael> Github topic: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1374<br>
&lt;dael> Florian: We resolved to take contain to CR, but overflow was not fpwd so it was rejected. Most of the refereneces from contain to overflow go to 3 now that we cleaned it. 4 references are about fragemnetation. Given that this is least stable, should we change which spec has that text so we don't depend on overflow 4?<br>
&lt;dael> fantasai: sgtm<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: It will get contain throught he pileline more questing<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Objectiontions to moving the text for itneration between contain and overtlow to level 4?<br>
&lt;dael> RESOLVED: moving the text for intreation between contain and overflow to level 4<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: If there's a process issue we can re-resolve, but let's use the old resolution<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1374#issuecomment-306957426 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 7 June 2017 23:44:51 UTC