Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-fonts] CSSFontFaceRule does not seem Web compatible

The CSS Working Group just discussed `CSSFontFaceRule does not seem Web compatible`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic: CSSFontFaceRule does not seem Web compatible<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/825<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: This was added by ChrisL.<br>
&lt;myles> https://www.w3.org/TR/2011/WD-cssom-20110712/#cssfontfacerule<br>
&lt;dael> myles: This is aboutwhat happens in CSSOM if you pull out a rule that represents a FontFaceRule. There's an old spec that says this only has one rule that is a style declaration.<br>
&lt;myles> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-4/#cssfontfacerule0<br>
&lt;dael> myles: This was updated to ^ which gets rid of the one style attribute and replaces with a bunch of strings.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Before you would get your rule in JS and say .style.getPropertyValue and in the new rule you say .faimly to get the string.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: Every browser impl the old. There have been proposals of what to do. 1) revert, 2) have both 3) make a .style but have it be a  new custom object with only some stuff and not all the g enerality of the style declaration.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: This came up  b/c I started making edits and I don't know what to do.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: My opinion is since browsers are standardized that's what should go in spec. I imagine there are other thoughts.<br>
&lt;tantek> +1<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: Most  people engaged in this aren't on the call today.  ChrisL, dbaron, TabAtkins are all not on the call.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: We can push. I'll give the speech again next week.<br>
&lt;dael> Rossen_: I'm sympathetic with your proposed opinion to standardize on one behavior. But I'd also like to hear from others that were in this conversation.<br>
&lt;dael> myles: That's fine.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/825#issuecomment-318113410 using your GitHub account

Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2017 16:47:34 UTC