- From: Oriol via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2017 22:13:01 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Loirooriol has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-display] Inlinified 'block ruby' should generate an inline-block wrapper == When a `block flow` element is inlinified, it becomes `inline flow-root` (i.e. inline-block) in order to preserve the block container. Shouldn't the same happen for `block ruby`? If you request your ruby container to be wrapped inside a principal block container (e.g. because you want to use `width` or `height`), shouldn't the block container be preserved (in the form of as inline-block) in case the element is unexpectedly inlinified by some ancestor? I think so. There should be a `ruby-root` inner display type and, just like `flow` becomes `flow-root` during inlinification, `ruby` should become `ruby-root`. Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1700 using your GitHub account
Received on Sunday, 6 August 2017 22:13:03 UTC