- From: Manuel Rego Casasnovas via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:07:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Yeah I was thinking on this the whole night and I believe we should just keep the current implementation. I've found some very weird issues, if a `grid-row-gap: 10%` would be treated as `auto` we could end up having gaps of different sizes. [An example to represent it with percentage tracks](http://jsbin.com/wisehow/1/edit?html,css,output) in a grid with `grid-template-rows: 100px 10% 100px 10% 100px`.  * One item spanning the first 3 rows with a content of 300px height, the 10% of the 2nd row ends up being 100px. * Another item spanning the last 3 rows, with a content of 250px height, the 10% of the 4th row ends up being 50px. Probably the spec needs to be updated: 1) The percentage resolution should be done exactly as it was before (like in regular blocks). 2) We should explicitly say that percentage gaps are resolved as 0px when the height is indefinite (for widths they'll behave like regular blocks). -- GitHub Notification of comment by mrego Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/509#issuecomment-248861020 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2016 10:07:44 UTC