- From: Mats Palmgren via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 16:33:32 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
2.2 is labeled "For content-based minimums" which to me means 'min/max-content', so I find the label misleading. 2.3 is labeled "For max-content minimums" which to me means 'max-content', so I find the label misleading. Just to make sure I understand the span>1 handling of 'auto' correctly: 2.1 "For intrinsic minimums", clearly includes 'auto' (unconditionally), so this means that an item that spans an 'auto' track first contributes its min-size contribution under 2.1, then also its min/max-content contribution under 2.2/2.3 (under intrinsic sizing). So the net effect for 'auto' in 2.1 - 2.3 is slightly different from the span=1 case due to the "Otherwise" there, is that intentional? -- GitHub Notification of comment by MatsPalmgren Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/500#issuecomment-248356882 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 16:33:42 UTC