- From: Boris Zbarsky via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:14:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Oh, and the unclear "if any" thing was already brought up as an issue, by me, back in <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Jul/0376.html>. As was the "proper table descendant" thing. I don't see any obvious reply to that mail so far, but that may just be the archive stupidity... That said, <https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?keywords=&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=Proposal+for+a+replacement+for+section+17.2.1+&hdr-2-name=from&hdr-2-query=&hdr-3-name=message-id&hdr-3-query=&period_month=&period_year=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=www-style&resultsperpage=20&sortby=date> shows no messages after that one responding to it, so those comments simply never got addressed. Unless the mail addressing them had some other subject? -- GitHub Notification of comment by bzbarsky Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/467#issuecomment-248260491 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 20 September 2016 10:14:25 UTC